Free case review(877) 924-2679
Practice area

Dog bite claims in California

California does not give a dog one free bite. The owner is liable for the first one, whether or not the dog had ever shown any sign of aggression, and whether or not the owner did anything careless.

Hurt and not sure where you stand?

One field. Put in your number and we will call you back — free, and with no obligation.

or call now
(877) 924-2679

Strict liability, stated plainly

Read that last clause again, because it disposes of the conversation most bite victims have with the owner. "He has never done that before" may well be true. It is also legally beside the point.

Two conditions: it must be a bite, and you must have been in a public place or lawfully on private property. Being an invited guest, a customer, or a postal worker all qualify.

The exceptions, honestly stated

  • Trespassing. The statute protects people lawfully present. Someone unlawfully on the property falls outside it, though an ordinary negligence claim may survive.
  • Provocation. A genuinely provoked dog is a defense. Insurers stretch this remarkably far — a child who patted a dog while it ate, or someone who stepped near a sleeping dog, is not provocation in any ordinary sense.
  • Military and police dogs performing their duties are excluded by statute.
  • Veterinary professionals and others who assume the risk through their occupation while treating the animal.
  • Injuries that are not bites. Being knocked over by an exuberant large dog is a real injury and a common one, but the strict liability statute covers bites. That claim proceeds in ordinary negligence, which requires showing the owner failed to control the animal — frequently straightforward where a dog was off-lead in a leash-required area.

Who actually pays

Almost always a homeowner's or renter's liability policy, which typically carries $100,000 to $500,000 of coverage. This is the part that distresses people most, because the owner is often a neighbor, a friend, or a relative.

It is worth being clear: a claim is made on insurance the owner purchased for exactly this purpose. The money does not come out of their pocket. That reframing resolves most of the discomfort, and a child's facial scarring is not something to absorb privately out of politeness.

Children and facial injuries

Children are bitten at face height because that is where their faces are when they lean toward a dog. The medical and legal consequences differ from an adult bite on the forearm.

Facial scarring in a child is evaluated over years, not months, and may involve revision surgery once growth is complete. Settling a child's facial injury early, before a plastic surgeon can say what the adult outcome will be, is a serious mistake. A minor's compromise also requires court approval in California, which exists precisely to stop that happening.

Psychological injury after a dog attack is real, well documented in children, and routinely omitted from claims because nobody asked about it.

Not sure if you have a claim?

Put in your number. We will call you back and tell you honestly.

or call now
(877) 924-2679

Questions people ask

The owner says the dog has never bitten anyone before.

That makes no legal difference in California. Civil Code section 3342 imposes strict liability on the owner regardless of the dog's previous behavior or the owner's knowledge of it. The first bite counts.

I do not want to sue my neighbor.

A claim is nearly always made against a homeowner's or renter's liability policy that exists for this purpose, rather than against the person's savings. Most people find that reframing resolves the difficulty, particularly where a child needs ongoing treatment.

The dog knocked my mother over but did not bite her.

The strict liability statute covers bites, so that claim proceeds in ordinary negligence instead — showing the owner failed to exercise reasonable control. That is often easy to establish, for example where a dog was off-lead in an area requiring a lead. Injuries from these knock-downs, especially hip fractures in older adults, can be severe.

Should we settle my child's claim now?

Generally not quickly. A child's scarring cannot be properly evaluated until growth is further along and a plastic surgeon can give a view on revision surgery and the final appearance. California also requires court approval of a minor's compromise, which exists to prevent children's claims being settled cheaply and early.

Reviewed October 2026 by Simon Aziz Budhwani, Esq., the attorney responsible for this site. Legal statements here name the California code section they rely on, so you can check them rather than trust them. This is information about the law in general, not advice about your situation.

Find out where you stand.

Tell us what happened and we will tell you honestly whether you have a claim worth bringing, what it is likely to involve, and how long it tends to take. The review is free and there is no fee unless there is a recovery.

Call me back

Just your number. Nothing else.

or call now
(877) 924-2679
Call now Free case review